The physical octave

The physical octave is an interval of two tones with frequency ratio 2:1. Humans perceive two tones one octave apart as similar. However, the perceptual octave is judged as perfect when the frequency ratio slightly exceeds 2:1. This phenomenon is called the « octave enlargement effect» (OEE). Theories of pitch perception attempted to explain it in terms of basic auditory mechanisms. However, aesthetical preference could also be involved. Up to now, the OEE in humans,is documented only by subjective data. The present study attempted to provide objective psychophysical data which would support that the OEE originates from basic auditory mechanisms rather than from aesthetical preference. Ten trained musicians were presented binaurally with two rapid melodic streams of pure tones. The streams had frequency distance ∆ varying around (and including) the physical octave and the task was to judge if the streams were exact transpositions of each other. We reasoned that performance should be optimal when ∆ is such that the tones of the two streams would sound maximally similar. An additional task of subjective identification of octave intervals was also performed. We hypothesized that if the explanation of OEE lies only on basic auditory mechanisms, then performance in the objective task should be best when ∆ would be an enlarged octave, while the subjective task should reveal preference for this ∆ too. The results partially supported this hypothesis, but did not exclude the additional possibility of an aesthetical preference for enlarged octaves. Perspectives for future experimentations are discussed.

1. Allen, D. (1967). Octave discriminability of musical and non-musical subjects, 7: 421.
2. Blackwell, H. and Schlosberg, H. (1943). Octave generalization, pitch discrimination,
and loudness thresholds in the white rat. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33(5),
3. Bonnard, D., Micheyl, C., Semal, C., Dauman, R. and Demany, L. (2013). Auditory

discrimination of frequency ratios: The octave singularity. Journal of Experimental Psy-
chology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(3), pp.788-801.

4. Briley, P., Breakey, C. and Krumbholz, K. (2012). Evidence for Pitch Chroma Mapping
in Human Auditory Cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 23(11), pp.2601-2610.
5. Brink, G. van den (1977). “Octave and fifth settings for pure tones and residues ounds,”i

n Psychophysicasn d Physiologyo f Hearing, edited by E. F. Evans and J.P. Wilson (Aca-
demic, London), pp. 373-379.

6. Brosch, M., Budinger, E. and Scheich, H. (2013). Different Synchronization Rules in Pri-
mary and Nonprimary Auditory Cortex of Monkeys. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,

25(9), pp.1517-1526
7. Dobbins, P. A., and Cuddy, L. L. (1982). “Octave discrimination: An experimental
confirmation of the ’stretched’ subjective octave,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 72, 411-4 15.
8. Cuddy L. L., Dobbins P. A. (1988). Octave discrimination: Temporal and contextual
effects. Canadian Acoustics, 16, 3–13
9. Demany, L., and Armand, F. (1984). “The perceptual reality of tone chroma in early
infancy,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 76, 57-66.
10. Demany, L. and Semal, C. (1990). Harmonic and melodic octave templates. The Journal
of the Acoustical Society of America, 88(5), pp.2126-2135.
11. Deutsch, D. (2013). The psychology of music. 1st ed. London: Academic, pp.127, 292-
12. Fransson, F., Sundberg, J., and Tjernlund, P. 1974. “The Scale in Played Music,” Swed.
J. Musicol. 56, 49-54
13. Hartmann, W. (1993). Auditory demonstrations on compact disk for large N. The Journal
of the Acoustical Society of America, 93(1), pp.1-16.
14. Hartmann, W. (1993). On the origin of the enlarged melodic octave. The Journal of the
Acoustical Society of America, 93(6), pp.3400-3409.

15. Idson, W. and Massaro, D. (1978). A bidimensional model of pitch in the recognition of
melodies. Perception Psychophysics, 24(6), pp.551-565.
16. Macmillan, N. and Creelman, C. (2010). Detection theory. 1st ed. New York, NJ [u.a.]:
Psychology Press, pp.7-55, 119-140.
17. Martin, D. and Ward, W. (1961). Subjective Evaluation of Musical Scale Temperament
in Pianos. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 33(5), pp.582-585.
18. McKinney, M. and Delgutte, B. (1999). A possible neurophysiological basis of the octave
enlargement effect. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(5), pp.2679-

19. Moerel, M., De Martino, F., Santoro, R., Yacoub, E. and Formisano, E. (2015). Rep-
resentation of pitch chroma by multi-peak spectral tuning in human auditory cortex.
NeuroImage, 106, pp.161-169.
20. Moore, B. (2003). An introduction to the psychology of hearing. 1st ed. Leiden [u.a.]:
Brill, pp.2-3.
21. Ohgushi, K. (1983). The origin of tonality and a possible explanation of the octave
enlargement phenomenon. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 73(5),
22. Rakowski, A., Rakowski, P. and Aranowska, E. (2017). Perception of Sellected Musical
Intervals In Full Frequency Range. Proceedings of the 5th Triennial ESCOM Conference,
September 2003(Hanover University of Music and Drama, Germany).
23. Sundberg J. Acoustic and psychoacoustic aspects of vocal vibrato. In: Dejonckere PH,
Hirano M, Sundberg J, editors. Vibrato. Singular; London: 1995.
24. Terhardt, E. (1971). Pitch shifts of harmonics, an explanation of the octave enlargement
phenomenon. Seventh international congress on acoustics, Budapest, pp.621-624.
25. Ward, W. (1954). Subjective Musical Pitch. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of
America, 26(1), pp.144-144.
26. Han, Y., Köver, H., Insanally, M., Semerdjian, J. and Bao, S. (2007). Early experience
impairs perceptual discrimination. Nature Neuroscience, 10(9), pp.1191-1197.

This entry was posted in Ψυχολογία and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Αφήστε μια απάντηση

Η ηλ. διεύθυνση σας δεν δημοσιεύεται. Τα υποχρεωτικά πεδία σημειώνονται με *